ElasticSearch vs AWS Drama: The Battle Between David and Goliath

In the ever-evolving landscape of open-source software, ElasticSearch finds itself at the center of a high-stakes confrontation with AWS (Amazon Web Services). This clash, reminiscent of the biblical tale of David and Goliath, has significant implications for the future of open-source software. In this article, we’ll delve into the unfolding drama between Amazon and Elastic, exploring the intricacies of open-source licensing and its impact on businesses.

The Licensing Shift

As of last week, ElasticSearch, once freely available as open-source software under the Apache 2.0 license, is undergoing a transformative shift. The new licensing structure introduces a dual license, incorporating a proprietary license alongside the Server Side Public License (SSPL), colloquially known as a ‘Fopen Source License.’

This change carries profound consequences, especially for major users like AWS. ElasticSearch’s move restricts how AWS can employ future releases of the software, notably impacting services like fully managed ElasticSearch. The license alteration serves as a strategic move to curb the dominance of large cloud providers, but it inadvertently affects another group – the dedicated contributors who shaped ElasticSearch over the past decade.

The Dilemma for Contributors

Open-source contributors, often working voluntarily in their free time, build the foundation of projects like ElasticSearch. The abrupt shift to a more restrictive license model disrupts the initial understanding that the software would remain free and open-source. While legally sound, this change leaves contributors in a precarious position, with their code transitioning into proprietary territory without due compensation.

Amazon’s Profit Motive

Behind ElasticSearch’s licensing maneuver lies a tale of profits and power dynamics. Amazon, with its colossal 1.6 trillion-dollar market cap, stands as a cloud giant, while Elastic, with a comparatively modest 15 billion-dollar market cap, grapples with profitability. Elastic accuses AWS of unethical practices dating back to 2015, including unauthorized trademark use and copying proprietary code.

The AWS Response

In response to Elastic’s licensing shift, AWS takes an unconventional stance. Instead of complying or negotiating, AWS decides to fork the ElasticSearch project, maintaining it as an open-source endeavor with the original Apache 2.0 license. This move effectively creates two versions of ElasticSearch – the official, restricted one, and the new Amazon fork, giving AWS control over the project’s trajectory.

Open Source: Understanding the Basics

To comprehend the ramifications of these developments, it’s essential to grasp the fundamentals of open-source software. Governed by the Open Source Initiative, open-source software must adhere to principles ensuring freedom of use and distribution, including for commercial purposes. Various licenses, such as Apache, MIT, and GPL, dictate the terms under which software can be used and shared.

Contribution and Licenses

Contributing to open source often involves accepting a contributor license agreement, granting the owning company specific rights to use the contributed code. This legal aspect adds a layer of complexity for developers engaging with open-source projects.

The Business of Open Source

Contrary to common belief, there are lucrative business models built on open-source software. Companies like Red Hat and Basecamp leverage open source for marketing, consulting, and offering premium hosted services. Elastic’s decision to shift its licensing model aligns with a strategy to monetize additional features and services aimed at enterprise clients.


In the realm of open source, ElasticSearch’s clash with AWS is a microcosm of larger industry dynamics. The intersection of profit motives, licensing intricacies, and community dynamics underscores the complexity inherent in managing and sustaining open-source projects. As the drama unfolds, it prompts developers and businesses alike to reflect on the delicate balance between innovation, collaboration, and the financial realities of the tech industry. Your thoughts on this ongoing saga are welcome in the comments below. Thank you for reading, and stay tuned for more insights into the ever-evolving world of technology.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *